Libraries Fighting Back (An Old Submission)
Libraries Fighting Back
By Damon Fillman
PHILADELPHIA-With the economic recession still tightening its grip on state budgets and job security, certain states are proposing cutting library funding to offset their financial woes. Pennsylvania in particular, under the leadership of Governor Ed. Rendell, proposed a contingency plan that would: reduce operating hours from 48.5 hours over six days to 21 hours over three days, staff cuts, and the removal of Tuesday and Saturday evening hours.
But library systems all over the state are fighting back.
Diane Kraus, an adult and child services employee at the Bucks County Free Library System says there is a grassroots effort going on that encourages library members to write to their legislators to support House Bill 1416 which would result in a 14.9 percent library cut instead of the 53 percent cut previously proposed. A list of legislators for each district is available at the front desk.
House Bill 1416 was introduced because library members and employees directly called their legislators expressing discontent, which resulted in Senate Bill 850 getting voted out by the House Appropriations Committee.
Senate Bill 850 is the Republican proposed state budget, which Governor Rendell says cannot be feasible without a tax increase. The bill is still flailing around Harrisburg.
The Democratic House members proposed House Bill 1416, which provides for a General Fund budget of $27.8 billion and will benefit libraries in the following ways: $68,000,000 for the Public Library Subsidy, $2,396,000 for Libraries for the Blind/Physically Disabled, $7,774,000 for the combined Library Access and Electronic Catalog line items, and $2,396,000 for the State Library.
The current budget includes $94,654,000 for library funding while House Bill 1416 includes $80,566,000, a reduction of 14.9 percent.
According to Glenn Miller of the Pennsylvania Library Association, which sends out a newsletter to The Bucks County Free Library System, House Bill 1416 is the best bill proposed and library employees should support it.
“People take advantage of Public Library services and are more aware of them during a recession, cutting funds for these services would result in a public outcry,” says Kraus.
Kraus says that not only are people utilizing typical library services like books, they are also participating in more leisurely activities which the library now provides because of modern technology; activities like computer games, internet browsing and DVD rentals.
With the recession choking out most family's disposable income, people are seeking library services for other oddities like applying for a job. With free access to the internet, people who cannot afford a computer or internet access at home have the opportunity to seek employment in an economy that has an unemployment rate of 9.4 percent.
Sarah McCormick, a member of the Upper Moreland Free Public Library says that when her father lost his job, they couldn't afford to pay their Comcast bill, which resulted in a loss of internet access, so she visits the library to check her e-mail and spend time on Facebook, a social networking site.
“I like to take advantage of the library's various services. You never realize how much the internet and computers are integrated in your life until you lose them yourself,” McCormick says.
While Pennsylvania's state budget is still being negotiated, other expenses are being cut to make up for additional losses, including funds for Community Colleges across the state. Also in jeopardy are various environmental protection funds like money for West Nile Virus Control.
Still, Kraus and other library employees at the Bucks County Free Library System are hopeful that things will look up.
“I don't understand why Republicans don't want to tap the rainy day fund. The governor insisted on it and so do Senate Democrats. When libraries are in serious jeopardy of losing crucial funds, doesn't that equate to a rainy day?” says Kraus.
The rainy day fund, which is Pennsylvania's emergency piggy bank, currently holds $750 million dollars. Governor Ed. Rendell proposed to tap nearly a quarter of that to alleviate the stress of the state's ailing economy.
David Fillman, Executive Director of AFSCME District Council 13, which represents state, local and municipal workers says that he would rather see the rainy day fund tapped than to see his members take a hit.
“I am hopeful that with House Bill 1416 and the persistence of Senate Democrats, we will have a budget that is suitable for our members and for the state. At this point, there really is no alternative than to get the budget finalized.” Fillman says.
Pennsylvania is not the only state facing budget woes. In recent days, Arnold Schwarzenegger, the governor of California, is pushing proposed budget cuts. Under his plan, major cuts will come out of health services, which have created a public outcry. The proposed cuts largely affect minority communities because it will slash funding for the Rural Health Services Department, which provides health services to underserved communities.
“The only thing we can do is hope for the best and pray for a rainy day.” Fillman says.
- Login or register to post comments
- 464 reads
Send to friend
The most recent group to
The most recent group to bear the brunt of demonization is bloggers. Are bloggers reporters? Should bloggers be censured? Are bloggers protected by press shield laws? Are bloggers protected by SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Policy)? Should bloggers be held to spelling, grammar and case type standards equal to a journalist? Should bloggers be held to the Federal and state laws for harassment and discrimination? Are bloggers part of human resources? From a human resource management perspective, a business that ties human resource strategy directly into the basic business strategy cycle, is more successful than those than those that perform those functions separately.
Most states, including Nevada and California, have shield laws on their books protecting privileged relationships. They include between lawyers and accountants and their clients. They include doctors and their patients. They include victims/witness advocates and victims/witnesses. California's shield law has been on their books since then Republican Governor Ronald Reagan approved it. It includes between reporters and their sources.
San Francisco Chronicle reporters Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams faced federal imprisonment over their reporting of sport's love of performance-enhancing drugs. Toni Locy, a USA Today reporter, was cited as in contempt by a federal judge and hit with a $5,000 a day fine. Why? Former Army scientist's possible role in the 2001 anthrax attacks. Locy refused to disclose her confidential sources in her anthrax attacks' investigation.
Ohio's Republican US Rep.Mike Pence sponsored a press shield bill creating a Federal confidential privilege between reporters and their sources. It passed in the House with a veto-proof 398-21. Pennsylvania's Republican Sen. Arlen Specter, ranking Republican on the Senate's Judiciary Committee, supports it “to aid in informing the public.” So also, do Senators McCain, Clinton and Obama. President Bush opposes it.
The Senate's Judiciary Committee approved it and sent it to the Senate Floor for action. Eight months later, Democrat and Senator Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada has still not called the measure up for a vote. Why?
* “Any law will test that First Amendment balancing act. So will the question of who is a journalist, given the millions of bloggers.”
Peter Drucker's article, Business Objectives & Survival Needs, was written before the invention of blogging and bloggers. It contains many practical and no-nonsense recommendations. Drucker's, "What does a business have to be, to do, to achieve -- to exist at all?" is of profound importance. Bloggers have forced businesses, individuals and government to reevaluate themselves. Businesses are finding out through bloggers that their job is not always to make as much money as possible, the cheapest way they could, and in the shortest period of time. Governments have found out that blogging is grass roots democracy. Businesses, governments and individuals have found out that bloggers, as investigative reporters or just complainers, are real-time exposes.
Drucker's key point is that for each survival need there should be a corresponding objective for the business, and that every business should have similar survival needs. Drucker advocates five survival objectives. 1) the need for a human organization designed for joint performance and capable of perpetuating itself. 2) The need for the business to survive within the business' society and economy. 3) The need to have a specific purpose which is to supply economic goods and services. 4) The need for the business to survive in a changing economy and technology. 5) The need for minimum business profitability.
Drucker further recommends that organizations acquire the understanding that all risks are costs. His emphasis is that profitability is objective; and that it is a claim of the enterprise not a claim against the enterprise. That profit is what minimum the business needs, not what maximum it can make. Blogging has proven just how correct Drucker was and remains.
The New York Times on May 10, 2008 quoted a Reid spokesperson in response to when the Federal press shield bill will be brought to the floor of the Senate for a vote: “ It's on our to-do list . . .”